Updated: 6 March 2011
Presentation Notes
Metal-line System Survey: Characterizing the
Low-z IGM
Conference presentation (pdf)
from the first Space
Astronomy: The UV Window to the Universe, El Escorial, Spain, May
2007
Metal-line System Survey: Characterizing the
Low-z IGM
Thank you for the opportunity to talk a little about metal-line
absorbers in the low-z IGM. This is work I do in large part
with Xavier Prochaska at UCSC, and, more recently, Hsiao-Wen Chen at U
Chicago has proved useful in understanding the relation between
absorbers and galaxies.
Outline
In this brief talk I'm going to start broad by mentioning a couple
interesting science questions that can be addressed with QAL
spectroscopy. Then I'll discuss work that's wrapping up on one
sightline where we've found evidence for a multi-phase IGM and a
qualitative association between metal absorbers and galaxy
groups. I'll wrap up with a peek at work that's just beginning and is
basically repeating "this" analysis on a larger sample, hoping to dig
out more statistics.
Quasar Absorption Line Spectroscopy
Just a quick illustration of QAL spectroscopy technique. You observe
some background quasar, and in its spectra will be (usually) many
absorption features that probe structure at various redshifts along
the pencil beam. Once you've sorted the features into Galactic and
intergalactic, you can start characterizing e.g., chemical composition
and evolution, structure.
Chemical Evolution of IGM
One interesting question that can be addressed at least in part by QAL
spectroscopy is the enrichment history of the IGM. Pettini et al
(2003) and others have found the IGM is enriched early with
C IV and the mass density is roughly constant from that
early time on (z ~ 1.5 to 5). So the interesting question is
what happens in the lowest redshift bins, which probe the last 9 Gyr
of the Universe and span the time after the peak in the star formation
rate so you would expect some evolution. I will return to this
question later (and I don't have an answer now.)
"Missing" Baryons
The next interesting topic I wanted to discuss briefly is the
"missing" baryons problem. From Big Bang nucleosynthesis models and
measure of the baryons at z ~ 3 in the Lyα forest, we know
how many baryons there should be around at z ~ 1. However,
surveys of the baryon content in various populations show a lack
(Fukugita and Peebles). From cosmological simulations, we see that
there may be a large reservoir of baryons in what is called the
WHIM. The simulations predict that the WHIM is collisionally-ionized,
shock-heated, moderately overdense medium that may have up to 40% of
the baryons at z ~ 1. Conveniently, this is difficult to observe
but the current best probe is the O VI doublet, which traces
the lower WHIM temperature range. (Could mention Mg X,
O VIII,...) So how are observations doing?
PKS1302-102: Search for O VI
This question started this project of studying one sightline. After
identifying all the lines, we walk away with a couple dozen Lyα,
half dozen C III absorbers, and 2 O VI
detected with confidence and 1 tentative one. There's overlap between
C III and O VI systems. Here are examples
from the spectra which is not the best S/N. I'm going to focus on this
strong OVI absorber and this strong Lyα absorber.
OVI at zabs = 0.04231
Shown here is the system stacked in velocity space centered at the
center of Lyα. The H I features show a Voigt
profile from log NH I and b from curve
of growth analysis (example later). The Lyα feature is
multi-component, and it appears that C III traces the
stronger H I component and O VI traces a
redward, weaker component. So we have a kinematic argument for a
two-phase medium, and we next can examine the possible ionization
mechanism from CLOUDY models.
Photoionization
For this photoionization model, the relative abundances of the various
C ions (one detection and two limits) constrain the ionization
parameter, which is the number of H I ionizing photons
to the number of H atoms. The abundance-dependent ratio
N(O VI)/N(C IV) indicates that
O VI is from a different photoionized phase.
Collisional Ionization
In the collisional ionization model, the idea that there are two
phases is stronger. As expected, O VI traces a hotter
component than C III, and in CIE, you absolutely can't
have C III and O VI.
Two-phase Medium
So we conclude that there are two phases (and this is supported by
kinematic arguments). Then you can decide whether it's two
photoionized media or a photoionized medium with collisionally-ionized medium.
zabs = 0.09487 Partial Lyman Limit System
For an example of another interesting system in the PKS1302 sightline,
I turn to the partial Lyman limit system. It has properties similar
to the z ~ 0.042 system previously discussed. there's a
kinematic difference between elements (show on the next slide). And
modeling supports two phases. It's a partial system because it's at
the edge of having enough column density. The COG analysis was for a
single component and that works well event though the profile is
multi-component.
Line Profiles
Lyα, C III, Si III have
multi-components where as O VI is broad. Note the Voigt
profiles look pretty good (values from single-component COG).
Lyman Limit Optical Depth
As an extra treat, we can try to measure the total
log NH I independent of the Doppler parameter
by measuring the flux decrement at the Lyman limit. The constraint
isn't as tight as the COG but is consistent. We were unlucky that
the Lyman limit falls at the edge of LiF 1A, and we're fighting noise.
Galaxy Survey
Last, I'd like to do a splash from our galaxy survey, in a qualitative
sense. Here's the quasar, 20' on a side, 95% complete within 5' to
R ~ 19.5 mag. Galaxies marked are within 1000 km/s of an
absorber. Strong O VI system has two galaxies within 300
kpc, and there is no galaxy brighter than 0.01 L* within
200 kpc. pLLS system, which also has strong C III and
Lyα system within 250 km/s, has 10 galaxies within 1000 km/s.
HST/STIS Archive Survey
Moving on to a slightly broader topic. Here's the next project(s) for
me. basically repeat the analysis I just presented on all metal-line
systems in the archives. Hearkening back to the Pettini et al (2003)
work, we'll be interested in C IV mass density at these
low redshifts.
How many absorbers will we find?
Taking the redshift pathlength from those 12 QSO's highlighted on the
previous slide, we can get a a rough sense of how many metals we'll
find. Prospects for C IV and Si IV will
improve when I include z > 0.6 QSOs.
Summary
To conclude, I hope I showed you a little of the power in QAL
spectroscopy. For the specific example of PKS1302, we come to the same
idea of a multi-phase IGM as others have seen. We also think galaxy
groups and metal absorbers are related. And I've mentioned the next
phase and what we can expect to find in the archives. Thanks.